Maria Parlapiano, Registered Nurse, International Board Certified Lactation Consultant, Postpartum Place, Chatham, NJ

An Open Letter in Support of Emma Kwasnica and all of us who have posted breastfeeding images

April 16, 2012

Dear Facebook Management,

 

Have you ever been expected to perform a task that you have never done before or even seen anyone do?  I hope not!  But that is exactly what mothers are up against as soon as they deliver their babies. Perform the skill of breastfeeding.  A skill that is so foreign, most women have never seen it done - ever!  Why? Because the visual image of breastfeeding has been completely lost!   Unless, we see images of women breastfeeding or allow nursing in public (which is the normal way to feed human babies), reproducing that skill set over and over, is nearly impossible.  Think about it.  How can something be normal when no one normally sees it?  How can we reproduce a skill we've never seen done?

 

There are not many people I know of who would like to be placed at such a disadvantage at their job or sport. But most importantly, a baby depends on its mother to properly know the skill set of breastfeeding yet the mother needs to depend on a society to foster that skill set, not degrade it!

 

Facebook, by your own conception, is an on-line society.  You have thus bestowed upon yourselves a social responsibility to allow breastfeeding images as a normal life experience - anything different is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Maria Parlapiano RN IBCLC

Postpartum Place

Chatham, NJ

Belinda Phipps, CEO, NCT (UK's largest charity for parents)

February 24, 2012

Open letter to Facebook


NCT is the UK’s largest charity for parents. Our 318 branches, 10,000 volunteers and 1,000 trained practitioners support thousands of parents-to-be and new parents every year through online and written information, face to face events and courses and a range of helplines. 
NCT supports parents however they decide to feed their baby. For many people, carrying out the decision to breastfeed can be very difficult and the support of others and a supportive society is essential if a woman is to successfully breastfeed for as long as she wishes. The WHO and 4 UK country Governments recommend exclusively breastfeeding for at least 6 months for optimal child health. Every year more than 200,000 mothers stop breastfeeding in the first few days and weeks - 90% of these mothers would have liked to continue.
As a result we were dismayed to read Facebook’s policy regarding posting of some photos of mothers and babies and the actions taken to remove some pictures from Facebook profiles depicting breastfeeding. Feeling proud as a new parent is everyone’s right and Facebook has been a wonderful addition to the range of ways that parents to be and new parents share their joys, concerns and the trials and tribulations of their new roles with their friends and family right across the globe. Women’s breasts come in all shapes and sizes (especially when they are feeding a new baby) and babies feed in many different positions.
We would urge Facebook to reverse this decision which relegates breastfeeding to a taboo subject when in fact it is a perfectly natural and common thing to do with 76% of mothers in the UK initiating breastfeeding when their baby is born. 
Very best wishes 
Belinda Phipps
CEO
NCT

Ann Sinnott, Author, "Breastfeeding Older Children"

February 21, 2012


To Mark Zuckerberg and Co

With adverse publicity all over the press and protests, real and virtual, breaking out all over, surely you now realise the absurdity of your stance toward breastfeeding photos? 

You have dug a hole for Fb and you know it! Your shifting parameters are ample testimony! Last year, you objected to the sight of a nipple (ignoring the fact that many women have large areolas which visibly extend beyond an infant’s mouth); this year, your objection is to the sight of a breast not actually being fed from.

In your recent statement, the protection of minors was cited as the reason you ban these innocent images. How spurious! How can you equate non-sexual images of children breastfeeding, with pornographic images that proliferate on countless Fb pages. If you were really protective of minors you would remove really offensive images: copulation partly shown (cropping does nothing to disguise) and provocatively sexualised near naked images of the female form (perhaps the male form too). I know what I’d prefer my child, or any other child, to see!

You also say you only remove photos when you receive complaints. What a cop out! Aren’t you capable of judging whether an image is offensive or not? 

So, come on, it’s time you admitted that, when working out your nudity guidelines, breastfeeding simply never crossed your minds! That’s no surprise – and merely reflects a bottlefeeding culture. 

But the health and social ramifications of artificial feeding are legion, and we are all affected! It’s not for nothing that governments around the world pile cash into breastfeeding promotion and support – not only for the growth and maintenance of physical health but also, and this is now becoming ever clearer, for optimal neural development and resultant psychosocial adjustment; both of these, in both childhood and in later adulthood.

It’s high time that Fb had a degree of social responsibility built into its structure!

Mothers encourage other mothers, and a picture is worth a thousand words!

So, admit your error (you will gain standing, not lose it), and facilitate.

Ann Sinnott
Breastfeeding Older Children
Free Association Press, 2010

Emily Rodriguez, Austin, TX

February 6, 2012

Dear Facebook Management,

I am writing to express my concern over Facebook’s actions in removing
photographs and freezing the accounts of breastfeeding mothers and
babies. These users are told that they have breached Facebook’s terms of
use by posting pornographic material to the site. Breastfeeding is in no way
pornographic and has many benefits for mother and babies.

Breastfeeding gives mother and baby skin to skin contact, eye contact and
relaxing bonding time. Mothers naturally want to remember these special times
and to share them with their friends and families. These mothers use Facebook
to share all the wonderful times they have with their babies, including nursing,
which for many mothers is a favorite time.

In addition to the bonding and emotional benefits nursing gives mothers
and babies, there are so many wonderful health benefits to nursing, as well.
Breastfeeding reduces the risks of Anemia, Osterperosis and Breast, Ovarian,
Cervical, and Endometrial Cancers for nursing mothers. Breastfed children have
a lower risk for vitamin D and iron deficiencies and they get antibodies from
mother’s milk to help them avoid sickness. Breastmilk offers protection against
Meningitis, Botulism, Childhood Lymphoma, Crohn's disease and Ulcerative
Entercolits.

Breastfeeding is a hot topic for many people, but that is even more of a reason
to normalize nursing in public now. Most people will agree that nursing is a
good thing if you follow certain rules. Ex. Don’t do it in public or cover up with a
blanket. Don’t breastfeed past a certain age (or teeth, or once they can ask for
it) and these things decrease the number of children getting breastmilk. It is so
important for our children to see breastfeeding to increase the number of people
successfully breastfeeding in the next generation. If it is hidden and taboo
people won’t want to do it, but if the very influential Facebook is standing behind
breastfeeding mothers we are one giant step closer to the normalization of public
breastfeeding.

The WHO recommends breastfeeding until two years of age and the AAP
recommends a year, but Facebook won’t even allow a picture of breastfeeding to
stay on it’s website. This sends the message that mothers are doing something
wrong and that is not the case.

Please stand behind breastfeeding mothers and babies. By agreeing that
breastfeeding is normal and in no way obscene you are contributing to the health
and wellness of all future mothers and babies.

Sincerely,

Emily Rodriguez

Tina Revai, Registered Nurse, Board Certified Lactation Consultant, British Columbia, Canada

An Open Letter in Support of Emma Kwasnica and all mother have posted breastfeeding images
February 5, 2012

Dear Facebook Management,

You have heard from many infant feeding experts. Breastfeeding is the normal biological way to feed
infants and young children, along with meeting their needs for connection to their primary caregiver.
The evidence is unequivocal that there are long term health effects for babies not breastfed and for
mothers who do not breastfeed.

In many countries women start out with the intent to breastfeed because families know this. This is
evidenced by the very high rates in which women and infants start out breastfeeding in the first few days
of life. In most areas this is well over 80% of women.

However, some women struggle to maintain this relationship in a greater society that is only beginning
to be conscious of the importance of nurturing infants and children in this way.

A significant source of connection for these women is each other. Women seek out other supportive
mothers. And as we shift into understanding that this is normal human behavior, women use Facebook
as an opportunity to share their parenting journey. This is what Facebook’s intent is – social connection!

Targeting the images of women and children engaged in normal, healthy human experience is
discriminatory. Discrimination against women hurts both women and the next generation of children,
boys and girls alike. And this costs all of us.

Please reconsider your actions. As a leader in on-line social media you have a corporate social
responsibility to have a positive impact on the greater society. Not a damaging one.

Yours sincerely,

Tina Revai

Registered Nurse, British Columbia, Canada

Board Certified Lactation Consultant

Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, USA & France, Intuitive Parenting Network, LLC

February 5, 2012

Dear Facebook Management,

• 
  
  I have gone round and round in my head trying to compose a letter to you that will address, in some meaningful way, the confounding behavior of your staff towards women on Facebook. What eludes me is any rational motivation for your actions that I might intelligently address or debate. The contradictory actions of your staff, when addressing issues that are of significance to the women who use your site have an almost arbitrary, adolescent tone to them.
  
  Given that 58% of your users are women and that women use social media far more actively than men, one might think you would have an interest in treating women with respect and dignity. Yet, based upon the actions of your staff, there appears to be an unwritten guideline that it is perfectly acceptable for images to be posted on FB that display womens’ bodies as objects of male sexual desire, commentary and misogynistic denigration. Images of women whose bodies are displayed solely for the pleasure of men can be found effortlessly on FB simply by typing in keywords that are commonly used by prepubescent boys to describe women’s breasts.
  
  By contrast, your staff appears to have taken quite the opposite attitude when women share images of themselves nursing their children. Pages that are designed to support and educate nursing mothers, allowing them to gain confidence, reflect their pride and even communicate their pleasure in the wondrous physiologic purpose of their own breasts are hassled, harassed and shut down. Even on personal pages, mothers are harassed for posting images of their children at breast.
  
  An obvious conclusion one might draw from the actions of your staff, actions which appear to contradict your own policies, is that the eight-member all-male Board of FB is uncomfortable with images of women taking pleasure in the nature of our bodies, our babies and our selves as mothers. A pleasure that does not include you. A pleasure that reflects our sexuality but is in no way sexual. Perhaps the idea that women truly delight in feeding and nurturing our babies at our breasts is disconcerting to you in some way.
  
  Whatever might be going on in your own minds about this, I would like to suggest that you…for lack of a better way to say it…grow up. Having stewardship over one of the most significant social tools used in the world today is not a role for adolescents or condescending bureaucrats. It is a role that ought to reflect intelligence, leadership and the forward-thinking creativity that put FB on the map to begin with. Like it or not, you are in the position to effect great change or inflict ongoing harm.
  
  The normalization of breastfeeding is surely one of the most significant public health issues of this century and you are uniquely positioned to catalyze a shift in the right direction by doing what all of us should do, and ignore images of nursing mothers, unless they are personally meaningful to us, just as we do with the millions of other ordinary images we see every day. The posting of a nursing photo is no different from the posting of an image of a child being fed or nurtured in any other way. It is no more significant to FB than a child at a birthday party, at the beach, in a swing. It is just life, the normal, everyday life of millions of women and children. By instructing your staff to simply react in no greater way to images of nursing children than they do to any other ordinary photo, a very important shift will occur. And the staff of FB will have grown into their stewardship in a responsible and meaningful way.
  
  Best Regards,
  Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, USA & France
  Intuitive Parenting Network, LLC
  holisticibclc.blogspot.com
  IParentLLC@aol.com

Rachel Myr, IBCLC, midwife, master's student in public health, listmother, Lactnet, Kristiansand, Norway

Open Letter to Facebook
February 4, 2012


Dear Facebook management,


I'm writing to support the repeal of your policy of censoring pictures
of breastfeeding and shutting down the profiles of some users who post
breastfeeding pictures, adding my voice to those of my colleagues in
other countries.  Breastfeeding is the normal way to feed human
babies.  It is the single most important measure for infant survival
world wide, it levels the playing field where there are social
inequalities in access to health care and to material wealth, it is
the normal way to promote and protect the health of the mother and the
child, and it fosters the normal development of social skills in both
as well.

I grew up in the US but now live permanently in Norway, where I work
as a midwife and breastfeeding specialist.  I am a lifelong member of
the Norwegian mother-to-mother breastfeeding support organization
Ammehjelpen, whose presence on Facebook has dramatically increased the
number of contacts we have with new mothers each year.  Even though
breastfeeding is relatively well protected in Norway compared to many
other developed countries, women still have trouble accessing skilled
help when they run into problems.  Our group could not function at the
same high level without Facebook as a contact arena.  It is an almost
universally used social medium in Norway and it is to be expected that
such an important part of life as breastfeeding is visible here.
Sometimes we exchange pictures on our discussion forum on Facebook and
many women here post pictures of themselves with their children.
Since babies spend a lot of time feeding, and it's one of the few
times they sit still long enough to be photographed, a lot of those
are breastfeeding pictures.  These pictures tend to elicit feelings of
warmth and loving kindness in the viewer, and that may also be why
images of breastfeeding have been common throughout human history.  I
don't need to reiterate what so many others have written on the
importance of making breastfeeding visible in our daily lives,
including on the internet.

It seems bizarre for an entity like Facebook, which is all about
bringing people together, to treat its members who practice the basic
model for human contact, the contact that sets the stage for all
future interaction in the life of the individual, as if they are doing
something wrong.  Please stop harassing your members who post photos
of breastfeeding on Facebook.  You will be doing far more than a
kindness to those members; you will be contributing in your way to
better health for everyone in the world.

Sincerely yours
Rachel Myr, IBCLC, midwife, master's student in public health and one
of the listmothers on Lactnet, a free, international listserv-based
discussion forum with over 3000 subscribers (and its own FB group!)
for people working in support of breastfeeding
Kristiansand, Norway

Dr Karleen D Gribble BRurSc, PhD, University of Western Sydney

Locked Bag 1797
Penrith NSW 2751 Australia
www.uws.edu.au

University of Western Sydney
College of Health and Science
School of Nursing and Midwifery
Building ER, Parramatta Campus
Telephone: +61 0 43 1118485
karleeng@uws.edu.au

4/2/2012

Dear Facebook Management,

I am writing to express my concern over Facebook’s actions in removing photographs of women who were breastfeeding or expressing milk stating that they have breached Facebook’s terms of use by posting pornographic material to the site. I think that Facebook’s actions demonstrate a lack of understanding of breastfeeding mothers and a lack of understanding of women’s rights in relation to breastfeeding.

Breastfeeding is a social activity, something that happens within groups and in a variety of locations and circumstances. As such, it is not surprising that women might share photographs of themselves breastfeeding with others on Facebook since Facebook is about connecting people with one another including the sharing of their lives and experiences with one another. Breastfeeding is an extremely important part of the lives of many women and sharing photographs is one way that women show how important breastfeeding is to them and how proud they are of their achievements in breastfeeding. Breastfeeding can be difficult for women to achieve.

Breastfeeding is also a learned skill. It is something that is best learnt about over time and through repeated exposure to seeing other women breastfeeding and listening to them talk about their experiences. On Facebook, mothers share with one another and with others their experiences of breastfeeding. By doing so they are helping one another as “friends” do. This builds community and Facebook is a wonderful conduit through which this “community service” can be provided. The photographs that women share on Facebook is just a part of the way that women share with one another but a necessary one, as the old adage goes, “a picture speaks a thousand words.” Women who share photographs of themselves breastfeeding are doing a good thing.

Every day in Australia women who are breastfeeding their infants and young children in public places are told to that they are behaving indecently and that they should cover up, leave or stop breastfeeding. Sometimes they are refused service or have their employment terminated because they are breastfeeding. When this happens to women in Australia there are options open to them; they can complain to the anti-discrimination board in the state in which they live or the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission because such actions may constitute illegal sexual discrimination. The person who has refused service or treated a woman poorly for breastfeeding in public may have done so because they thought that breastfeeding is something that should not be seen, that it is indecent behaviour, that it is akin to having sex in public. However, the law disagrees. Someone who has sex in public can be charged with being engaged in an indecent act in public, they may be found to have broken the law. In contrast a woman cannot be charged with indecency for breastfeeding in public because breastfeeding is a protected activity, to discriminate against a women who is breastfeeding (or expressing milk) in public is to break the law. Facebook seems to have confused having sex with breastfeeding. Just as it is not possible for a woman to be charged with acting indecently for breastfeeding in public it is not possible for a photograph of a woman breastfeeding to be pornographic.

Facebook may be in an interesting legal position. Facebook’s removal of service to women in Australia who have included photographs of themselves breastfeeding or expressing milk may be a type of illegal sexual discrimination. It would be of great interest to the media and the general public should such a case ever be brought against Facebook.

I would add my voice to those requesting that Facebook cease harassing breastfeeding women, removing photographs of breastfeeding and removing their service from breastfeeding women.

Dr Karleen D Gribble BRurSc, PhD

Dianne Nikiforuk, RN, BScN, IBCLC, Drayton Valley, Alberta, Canada

January 29, 2012
Menlo Park

San Francisco, CA

Attention CEO Mark Zuckerberg

COO Sheryl Sandberg

I respectfully urge you to reconsider your position on posting photos of mothers’ breastfeeding children on their Facebook pages.

Nudity meant to titillate is rampant in our society on many levels in advertising, magazines, movies, television etc. Mothers feeding their infants/children is not and has never been one of those situations. Historically, women breastfeeding children in public was photographed and captured in other art forms as a matter of course. Only since the sexualization of the female breast in the mid twentieth century has this created a chasm between women’s roles as lovers and women’s roles as mothers. http://www.mothering.com/jenniferjames/

Refusing to post photos reinforces the stereotype of the female body as unacceptable and not to be honoured and respected for its amazing ability to provide life sustaining food and nurturing to every infant born regardless of gender, family economic situation, race, or parents educational level.

It is time to support mothers’ efforts to provide the nurturing and food only they were designed to provide. Governments around the world encourage exclusive breastfeeding for the firsts six months of life, introduction of complementary foods and continuing into the second year of life and beyond. The future of our world depends on it – health outcomes for mother and child, food security, and environmental impact.

Respectfully

Dianne Nikiforuk, RN, BScN, IBCLC Drayton Valley, Alberta

Edith Kernerman, IBCLC, President and Executive Director, International Breastfeeding Centre Clinic Director, Newman Breastfeeding Clinic, Ontario Lactation Consultants Association

President and Executive Director, International Breastfeeding Centre
Clinic Director, Newman Breastfeeding Clinic

1255 Sheppard Avenue East
Toronto, ON, Canada, M2K 1E2
416-498-0002, phone 416-498-0012, fax
www.nbci.ca edith@nbci.ca
Open Letter to Facebook

February 2nd, 2012

Dear Facebook Management,

As the Executive Director at the International Breastfeeding Centre I have the privilege of working with healthcare professionals, med students, midwifery, nursing and lactation students from all around the world. As President of the Ontario Lactation Consultants Association, I have the privilege of representing over 1000 lactation consultants in our fair province. In these capacities I write to you appalled at FB's blatant disregard for human rights in Canada. I had understood FB to be a company with a vision, with integrity, with courage. By allowing its employees to remove breastfeeding photos posted by FB users FB is discriminating against women and infringing upon their rights to free speech and free expression. This is not courageous—this is cowardly. As well, in suspending accounts, and sending bullying threats to its consumers, FB is sending a clear message to the public that though breastfeeding is protected under our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, FB doesn't care about these rights.

For a moment though, I would like to talk to you not as a breastfeeding advocate, nor as a mother of 3 breastfed children (one of whom is a newborn currently still breastfeeding); not as an educator in the field of lactation medicine, nor an author of numerous protocols used worldwide in hospitals and birthing centres; not as an international speaker; not even as a blogger, researcher, or employer. Instead, I would like to speak to you as an investor.

It is as an investor where I am just as appalled: FB stocks are going public. Congratulations to a company that has seen an unprecedented growth in such a short time, a company whose future and stability look very attractive. But there is a little glitch that concerns me greatly: you can't seem to keep control of your employees. How well can a company be run if its employees exercise their own powers by voicing opinions on the public stage, within the FB product, that is in direct opposition to the vision and direction of the company? This is unimaginable for a corporation going public. If FB employees are going rogue without any repercussions then this is not a company I would be interested in investing my money. The fact that FB cannot keep a handle on the discriminatory and unfair hurtful practices of its employees who disregard and disrespect the human rights of Canadians is of real concern. Add that this discriminatory behaviour hurts women and children and I am sure my FB and Twitter friends, Blog readers, and over 1 million website users would agree.

Banning breastfeeding photos was yesterday's bad idea. Such superficial pseudo-puritanical behaviour flies in the face of everything FB has shown itself to represent. Smarten up FB. Get a hold of your staff, do some house cleaning and have the courage of your publicly-stated convictions to get current. Stand behind the apology you made to Emma Kwasnica, reinstate all FB accounts and photos and ensure such foolish and costly actions never happen again.

In so doing you will show Canadians you are a company of integrity and responsibility and one worth investing in.

E.

Edith Kernerman, IBCLC, NBCI
President, OLCA CANADA

edith@olcacanada.ca
www.olcacanada.ca

Teresa Pitman, lactation expert, author, "The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding"

Open Letter to Facebook
January 30, 2012

Dear Facebook Management:

I’m the author of three published books on breastfeeding and hundreds of magazine articles. I was the Executive Director of La Leche League Canada for three years, and I’m a frequent speaker at parenting and lactation conferences. I’ve been helping mothers breastfeeding for more than three decades.

I know a lot about breastfeeding, and also about the barriers that make it difficult for so many women to succeed.

By removing, or allowing your employees to remove, photographs of breastfeeding, you are adding to those barriers.

Women are told by their doctors, midwives and other health care experts that breastfeeding is the most appropriate and healthiest way to feed a baby. We have stacks of research to show that this is true. Naturally, the majority of women do choose breastfeeding.

But when they share their joy and pride in giving their babies this wonderful gift by posting photos on Facebook, only to get a stern warning that the photos are “obscene,” they feel hurt. They feel embarrassed. They feel shamed. Their bottle-feeding friends who posted photos of babies enjoying their bottles didn’t get messages like that.

If the new mother was a little nervous about going out in public with her breastfeeding baby, now it’s worse. If Facebook thinks breastfeeding is obscene, what other reactions might she get?

And the young woman or teenage girl who doesn’t yet have children also learns an unintentional message: all over Facebook she can see photos of babies with bottles, but none of babies breastfeeding. The message? Bottle-feeding is normal, breastfeeding isn’t.

Breastfeeding is too important for the health of babies, mothers and ultimately the planet to be subject to the whim of insufficiently-trained employees. Please take whatever steps you need to ensure that breastfeeding photos are no longer removed, whether or not some skin or nipple is visible. The laws in both the US and Canada are quite clear that in a breastfeeding context, this is not obscene or inappropriate.

Thank you for supporting mothers and babies.

Teresa Pitman

Teresa Pitman has been writing about birth, breastfeeding and parenting for more than 25 years. She co-writes the popular "Steps and Stages" columns in Today's Parent, Canada's national parenting magazine, and has also written for many other magazines, including Mothering, Family Fun, Chatelaine, and More. She also has 14 published books. As a long-time La Leche League Leader, she was thrilled to be asked to co-write the 8th Edition of The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding (published in 2010).

Teresa has been invited to speak at conferences across Canada and the US and as far away as New Zealand. She's the mother of four grown children and the grandmother of four and lives in Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Laurie Wheeler, RN, MN, IBCLC, New Albany, Mississippi

Open Letter to Facebook

1-30-2012

Dear Mr. Mark Zuckerberg

     I am a Facebook user and encourage you to allow photos of women and families sharing the joy of breastfeeding.  I also work in a Women's Center at a rural hospital in Mississippi. Women often need to and want to go to the internet for "how to" breastfeeding pictures and videos as well. Breastfeeding is the normal way for a baby to eat, and it's a normal and important part of mothering.   

I sincerely hope you will reverse your practice of censoring these pictures.

Laurie Wheeler RN MN IBCLC

New Albany Mississippi

Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine: Facebook Flack Regarding Breastfeeding Mothers

January 12, 2009

For immediate release 
Contact: Karla Shepard Rubinger, Executive Director, Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, (914) 740-2100, ext. 
2153, abm@bfmed.org

Facebook Flack Regarding Breastfeeding Mothers 

New Rochelle, NY, January 12, 2009—The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine
feels that the social networking website, Facebook, would be well advised to review
its policy banning photographs of breastfeeding mothers. Such a policy perpetuates
the notion that breastfeeding is an unseemly bodily function best kept from public
viewing, a misguided and antiquated concept that has no place in contemporary
society. It further perpetuates the idea that formula feeding is normative when
breastfeeding is, and should be considered, normative infant and young child
feeding. Health professionals widely acknowledge that breastfeeding is biologically
unique and appropriate for the mother and infant.

Throughout most of history, breastfeeding, whether performed in private or
otherwise, has been regarded as a natural and wholesome aspect of daily living. In
fact, some of the greatest works of Renaissance art dealt with the theme of the
Virgin Mary breastfeeding her infant son (the Madonna Lactans).

So important is breastfeeding for the well-being of infants, mothers, and society at
large that no less than forty four states have enacted legislation safeguarding the
right of a mother to breastfeed in public. The Surgeon General’s Blueprint for Action
on Breastfeeding encourages “images of breastfeeding as the normal way to feed
infants in most places women and their infants go.” Facebook should certainly be
considered one of those places.

The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (www.bfmed.org) is a worldwide
organization of physicians dedicated to the promotion, protection and support of
breastfeeding and human lactation through education, research, and advocacy. An
independent, self-sustaining, international physician organization and the only
organization of its kind, ABM’s mission is to unite members of various medical
specialties through physician education, expansion of knowledge in breastfeeding
science and human lactation, facilitation of optimal breastfeeding practices, and
encouragement of the exchange of information among organizations.

This e-mail was sent by:
The Mary Ann Liebert Companies
140 Huguenot Street, 3rd Floor
New Rochelle, NY 10801-5215, USA

Ruth Piatak, BA, MS, IBCLC La Leche League Leader WIC Breastfeeding Peer Counselor Tulsa, Oklahoma

Open Letter to Facebook
Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM


Dear Facebook,

I finally overcame my fear of social media in the past year, and have enjoyed being on Facebook for several months.  It has been a great blessing to keep in touch with colleagues, with old friends in places where I have lived before, and with my adult children and nieces and nephews who think of it as the NORMAL way to communicate in this era.  Facebook is also a great way to keep current on the concerns of the demographic I serve as a lactation professional -- childbearing women, who may spend many hours a week nurturing their children at the breast while communicating electronically using the free hand that doesn't have to hold a bottle.

Breastfeeding, like other kinds of healthy eating, is a SOCIAL activity and is properly found where people are networking socially.  It is important for the Facebook generation to understand through their NORMAL communication channels that breastfeeding is the NORMAL way to feed infants.  

Facebook has an important role in ensuring that visual portrayals of children being nurtured at the breast are allowed to be part of NORMAL social exchange.  I am confident that Facebook and its employees can devise a way to screen images that does not censor normal infant feeding.  The U. S. Surgeon General chose Breastfeeding Support as her Call to Action last year -- emblematic of the influence of social support on the activity that is the foundation of each new person's health.  Lack of breastfeeding causes great losses to Americans' health and the U. S. economy.  I urge Facebook to be part of the solution. 

Ruth Piatak, BA, MS, IBCLC

La Leche League Leader

WIC Breastfeeding Peer Counselor

Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tammy Scott, mom, Facebook user, and Facebook advertiser

Open Letter to Facebook
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:35:05 -0500


I am a mom, facebook user, and facebook advertiser (I've held executive positions in advertising and marketing for some of the world's top brands, all of which advertised on facebook). I was appallled to find out this week that Facebook is discriminating against women who feature images of breastfeeding on their wall, and in some cases blocked their accounts. I saw several of the "problematic" (using your words) pictures, and assure you there was nothing innapropriate with them!

I am very interested in finding out why facebook thinks it's OK to discriminate against moms, when they are in fact some of your most active users? They also happen to be the ones responsible for about 80% of household purchases in most parts of the world, so as a past facebook advertiser, I certainly wouldn't want to be associated with a brand that offends them! Based on the number of posts, email chains, and other forms of viral communications in reaction to your recent actions, I am not alone being upset over this issue.

In many parts of the world it is illegal to discriminate against women who breastfeed in public. For example, the UK launched the Equality Act in 2010 (see info at:http://www.maternityaction.org.uk/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/breastfeedingpublicplace.pdf). Perhaps facebook staff need a little bit of sensitivity training on this issue?

I hope to hear back from you soon. I really don't think this will just go away quietly.

Tammy Scott
tammy_scott99@hotmail.com